Truth, Inspiration, Hope.

Xi Jinping’s Purge Hits Inner Circle As Zhejiang Network Loyalists Face Corruption Charges

Published: June 8, 2026
Party delegates doze during the opening session of the National People's Congress, China's rubber-stamp legislature, on March 5, 2007. (Image: Guang Niu/Getty Images)

A former subordinate of Cai Qi, the Politburo Standing Committee member who oversees the Party’s day-to-day operations as director of the General Office of the Central Committee, surrendered to investigators on May 29, 2026. Six days later, a senior member of Xi’s Zhejiang cadre network was formally arrested and indicted on bribery charges. Tang Jingyuan, a U.S.-based political commentator who covers CCP elite politics, argued in his online program that officials this closely tied to Xi and to Cai Qi would be untouchable if Xi still held unchallenged control over the Party apparatus. 

Cai Qi’s former research aide surrenders to investigators

On May 29, 2026, the Party’s interlocking anti-corruption and internal surveillance bodies, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission, published an announcement through their official website: Dong Guibo, the former Party secretary and director of Zhejiang Province’s state assets commission, was under investigation for “serious violations of discipline and law.” The announcement specified that Dong had surrendered voluntarily, a designation that carries procedural significance inside the Party’s disciplinary machinery.

The connection between Dong and Cai Qi is direct. Between January 2010 and November 2013, Cai served as head of the Zhejiang Provincial Organization Department, the body that manages Party personnel appointments across the province. During that same period, Dong held an attached post as deputy director of the department’s research office, making him Cai’s direct subordinate and, in practice, his personal secretary.

The relationship did not end there. Cai subsequently promoted Dong to deputy director and Party committee member of the Zhejiang state assets commission, and then to deputy mayor of Taizhou, a coastal city in southeastern Zhejiang. The Taizhou appointment reflected the depth of Cai’s trust: Cai himself served as Taizhou’s Party secretary from April 2004 to April 2007, and the city remains closely associated with his political base. Placing his former research office aide into a senior post in his own former stronghold signals a degree of trust that went beyond routine bureaucratic patronage.

In February 2017, Dong was elevated to standing committee member and deputy mayor of Taizhou, also taking charge of the Taizhou Bay Circular Economy Industrial Cluster Zone, a development project Cai himself had championed during a research visit to the city in February 2014. Dong’s stewardship of the project was, in retrospect, a continuation of his patron’s political agenda.

China’s Politburo Standing Committee member Cai Qi arrives for the High-Level Meeting on Peace and Security of the 2024 Summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) at the National Convention Center on Sept. 5, 2024 in Beijing, China. (Image: Tingshu Wang – Pool/Getty Images)

Xi’s Zhejiang protégé arrested and indicted on bribery charges

Gao Xingfu, who served as deputy governor of Zhejiang Province and deputy director of the provincial legislature before his removal from office in August 2025, is described in Chinese political circles as a core member of the “Zhejiang New Army,” the informal label for the network of officials Xi cultivated and elevated during his years as Zhejiang’s Party secretary, from late 2002 to early 2007.

On June 4, 2026, China’s top state prosecution body, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, a Party-controlled institution with no meaningful independence from the political leadership, announced that Gao’s case had been transferred from the National Supervisory Commission for review and indictment. Prosecutors formally arrested Gao on suspicion of accepting bribes, designated a procuratorate in Yichun city, Jiangxi Province, to handle the case, and subsequently filed charges with the Yichun Intermediate People’s Court. The indictment states that Gao exploited his official positions and the access his rank conferred to seek benefits for others, receiving money and property in return, and that the amount involved was “especially enormous,” the legal threshold the Party uses to signal the most serious tier of corruption charges.

Before his elevation to deputy governor, Gao had built his career in state-owned enterprise management, serving as general manager of the Zhejiang Construction Group, chairman of the Zhejiang Construction Investment Group, and from January 2015, chairman of the Zhejiang Communications Group. His appointment in August 2016 as deputy governor, moving directly from a state enterprise chairmanship into a provincial leadership post, was the first such appointment in Zhejiang in 21 years.

From September 2018 to January 2022, Dong served as deputy secretary-general of the Zhejiang provincial government, a role that placed him in direct administrative service to Gao, then the sitting provincial governor, effectively making Dong Gao’s chief of staff during that period.

Chinese leader Xi Jinping raises a teacup while meeting Tajik President Emomali Rahmon at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Sept. 2, 2025. Rahmon is not pictured.(Image: Parker Song – Pool / Getty Images)

Two loyalists purged in six days signal factional assault on Xi’s network

Dong Guibo is a Cai Qi loyalist. Gao Xingfu is a Xi protégé from the Zhejiang years. Together they represent two concentric rings of the current leadership’s inner circle. Tang argues that Xi’s inability to shield officials this close to him and to Cai Qi points to a leadership whose grip on the disciplinary apparatus is weaker than it appears.

The “voluntary surrender” label attached to Dong’s case warrants scrutiny. Inside the Party’s disciplinary system, officials who surrender before a formal investigation is announced typically do so either under coercive pressure from investigators who have already assembled sufficient evidence, or under instruction from political patrons seeking to control the damage and the narrative. In either reading, the framing of Dong’s fall as an act of volition obscures the political dynamics at work.

Tang and other commentators read the pattern as one of encirclement: anti-Xi factions within the Party, operating through the disciplinary and prosecutorial machinery, are systematically targeting officials one or two steps removed from the leadership’s core, probing for weaknesses and demonstrating that Xi’s patronage network offers no reliable protection. The simultaneous targeting of an official in Cai Qi’s orbit and one directly tied to Xi’s Zhejiang years concentrates that pressure on two of the most senior figures at the apex of the current leadership structure.

Whether this amounts to a coordinated factional offensive or a series of individually motivated prosecutorial actions is, by the Party’s nature, impossible to confirm from the outside. Two of the officials closest to that network, one tied to Cai Qi and one personally promoted by Xi, now face criminal prosecution through the same disciplinary machinery Xi nominally controls.