Truth, Inspiration, Hope.

EU Commission Runs Risk Analysis on Business With China

Victor Westerkamp
Victor resides in the Netherlands and writes about freedom and governmental and social changes to the democratic form of nations.
Published: October 5, 2023
Executive Vice President for Trade Valdis Dombrovskis (L) and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (R) leave a press conference during the tenth China-EU high-level economic and trade dialogue at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing on September 25, 2023. The EU currently runs a risk analysis into the pros and cons of staying in business with China. (Image: PEDRO PARDO/AFP via Getty Images)

The European Commission has launched another risk analysis into China as an economic partner and a possible threat, focusing on artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductor products, and bio- and quantum technologies.

According to the European Commission, given the growing rivalry with China, these four security-related technology areas in the EU will be subjected to a comprehensive risk analysis by the end of the year. 

The four technology areas are selected based on the potential that technologies could have for fundamental changes in the world of technology, espionage, and the international arms race since the question remains to what extent the technologies in question could also be misused militarily or to restrict fundamental human rights, such as freedom of expression.

An example of the misuse of AI is considered to be an instrument that could manipulate public opinion through social media, mainstream media, and election campaigns to handle public perception management and steer public sentiments in the desired direction.

Depending on the outcome of the analysis, protective measures, for example, export controls and efforts to reduce dependence on certain suppliers, will be initiated in further steps. 

De-risking rather than decoupling

The plans presented are part of an economic security strategy intended to minimize risks arising from increasing geopolitical tensions and accelerated technological change. At the same time, it should mandate high economic openness and dynamism.


The wording follows the same rhetoric seen from U.S. political leadership, which says it is “de-risking” rather than “decoupling” from Communist China. 

EU Commission head Ursula von der Leyen repeatedly emphasized that, in her view, decoupling from China is neither feasible nor in Europe’s interests. That is why she advocates keeping communication channels open while cooperation with China on issues such as climate control, pandemic response strategies, and financial cooperation should be sought.