By Li Jingyao, Vision Times
China’s secrecy apparatus, known as one of the most shadowy corners of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) internal security system, is undergoing an unexpected shake-up that analysts say could carry serious implications. The abrupt dismissal of its two highest-ranking officials has intensified speculation that the turmoil may extend upward to one of President Xi Jinping’s closest political allies: Politburo Standing Committee member Cai Qi. The Politburo serves as China’s top ruling body.
On Nov. 26, China’s State Council quietly released what appeared to be a routine list of personnel changes. But buried within the notice were two shocking removals:
- Li Zhaozong, director of the State Secrets Bureau
- Shi Yingli, deputy director of the bureau
Quietly removed without explanation
Neither departure was attributed to “age reasons,” the standard formula for retirement. No justification was provided at all — a notable omission for dismissals at this level. The announcement also named Song Gongde, a legal scholar with prior experience in the CCP General Office, as the new director.
Li Zhaozong previously worked in the General Office’s cryptography division before serving as director of the National Cryptography Administration. He had led the State Secrets Bureau since 2021 and was a member of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. Shi Yingli, like Li, also rose through the General Office system.
Success
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Success
Check your email to complete sign up
RELATED: Reports: Ma Xingrui and Wife Detained as Xi’s Inner Security Network Dwindles
Their simultaneous, unexplained removal immediately triggered widespread attention from analysts and netizens alike.
A bureau under Cai’s direct oversight
The State Secrets Bureau operates jointly with the Central Secrecy Commission Office — a single institution with two official names. Structurally, it belongs to the CCP Central Committee’s General Office, the powerful nerve center overseen by Cai Qi.
In October and November, the bureau made an unusually public series of statements, including:
- Accusing domestic media outlets of inserting “sensitive content” from internal reference documents into news reports
- Warning of “foreign infiltration” after a PhD student was accused of supplying terrain maps to overseas agents
During the same period, the Ministry of State Security issued its own alerts, including a case involving a retired employee accused of leaking classified information. The sudden surge in public messaging from China’s secrecy and intelligence agencies had already prompted questions before the leadership purge.
RELATED: CCP Military on Edge: Analysts Warn the PLA May Move on Xi by Toppling Cai Qi First
The dismissals came at a politically charged moment. For twelve consecutive days, Cai Qi disappeared from public view — the longest absence since assuming leadership of the General Office. When he reappeared on Nov. 20 at a symposium marking Hu Yaobang’s 110th birthday, state television footage showed him visibly fatigued, with pronounced eye bags and a strained expression.
Is Cai Qi under investigation?
Soon after, unverified posts in political circles online claimed he was under internal investigation. Some alleged he had been questioned; others suggested he had been taken from Guangdong by senior military officers.
However, the proximity of Cai’s unexplained absence to the sudden purge of the State Secrets Bureau’s leadership has fueled speculation that the moves may be connected, or that he himself may be under pressure.
RELATED: CCP Under Siege: Sources Say Xi Loyalist Cai Qi Seized By Zhang Youxia Himself
The State Secrets Bureau traditionally operated far from public scrutiny, issuing few statements and rarely appearing in state media. In recent months, however, it has stepped into the spotlight with warnings about espionage, directives to journalists, and public accusations against the media — roles more commonly associated with other security organs within the CCP.
Now, with both its top officials removed and its supervising Politburo Standing Committee member facing intensified scrutiny, China’s secrecy apparatus has entered an unusually turbulent phase.
Whether these developments reflect tightening internal discipline, factional pressure, or undisclosed breaches of security remains unclear. But abrupt personnel shake-ups inside agencies responsible for information control rarely occur without deeper significance.
Editor’s Note: This report examines developments inside the CCP’s secrecy and internal security apparatus. Because information on elite investigations and disciplinary actions is tightly restricted, some details cannot be independently verified. The analysis is based on official announcements, observable personnel changes, and assessments from credible political observers.
