The Trump administration recently issued an internal memorandum expanding the detention authority of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) over certain individuals who have already obtained refugee status. This policy adjustment was issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and was disclosed in documents related to federal court litigation.
According to reports from Reuters and The Washington Post on Feb. 19, the new guidance changes the relatively lenient enforcement practices that have existed for more than a decade during the refugee status adjustment process.
Under current U.S. law, individuals granted refugee status can apply to adjust to lawful permanent resident status—commonly known as a green card—after one year in the United States. Previously, policy generally allowed refugees to remain in their communities during the adjustment period; delays in the process alone would not result in detention. Enforcement guidelines established in 2010 explicitly stated that failure to timely complete the status adjustment should not, by itself, be grounds for detention or removal proceedings.
However, the new memorandum issued by DHS revises this practice. Under the new policy, refugees who have been in the U.S. for more than a year but have not completed the permanent residency adjustment process may be required to undergo government review again. The memo specifies that refugees with pending adjustments must undergo a second round of “congressionally authorized” screening to check for public safety, fraud, and national security risks. During this review, immigration officers are authorized to implement detention measures. The government stated in court filings that the measure aims to ensure that all entrants undergo a uniform and consistent security review during the adjustment process, emphasizing that it is intended to protect public safety and maintain the integrity of the immigration system.
Reports note that government documents do not specify a maximum detention period nor clearly define under what circumstances detention may be waived. These details may be clarified during implementation. The DHS did not respond to media requests for comment outside regular business hours.
Success
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Success
Check your email to complete sign up
The policy adjustment has already sparked legal debate. Related issues are currently being considered in federal court. In Minnesota, a federal judge has issued a temporary injunction on certain refugee detention practices, requiring that the measures be paused while the case proceeds. The judge noted at a hearing that whether the measures are legally authorized remains to be determined. The final ruling could affect nationwide policy implementation.
In a broader context, since returning to office, the Trump administration has continued to strengthen immigration enforcement measures. Reuters reports that the number of individuals in ICE detention has increased compared with previous levels. The government maintains that the core objective is stronger screening and enforcement consistency, while some immigration advocacy groups have expressed concern that the policy changes may create uncertainty for refugees in the adjustment process.
Analysts note that this policy adjustment not only changes enforcement authority but also reflects a shift in the federal government’s approach to immigration management. In the coming weeks, federal court rulings, the release of implementation guidelines, and potential further legal challenges will determine whether the policy can be fully implemented and its practical impact on the refugee population.
By Tian Jingxin
