Truth, Inspiration, Hope.

Former Officials Comey and Bolton Face Separate Federal Indictments in Classified and False-Statement Cases

Published: October 18, 2025
FBI-spied-on-Americnas-278,000-times-in-2021-Getty-Images-1242409189
A seal reading "Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation" is displayed on the J. Edgar Hoover FBI building in Washington, DC, on Aug. 9, 2022. (Image: STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed criminal indictments against former National Security Adviser John Bolton and former FBI Director James Comey. Bolton faces 18 counts related to the alleged mishandling and transmission of classified national security information, while Comey has been charged with making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation. The cases represent an unusual instance of two former high-level officials being prosecuted by the government they once led.

The indictments have sparked debate among legal experts and lawmakers, who question the clarity and scope of the charges. In Comey’s case, the indictment provides few specifics about the alleged false statements or obstructive actions, leaving the details of the government’s case largely unclear. Meanwhile, Bolton’s charges focus on the handling of classified materials, highlighting ongoing concerns about the protection of sensitive national security information.

Specifically, prosecutors allege that Bolton shared “diary-like entries” derived from his notes as National Security Advisor, with unauthorized individuals — identified as his wife and daughter — and that he retained classified documents and other materials at his home and on personal devices after leaving government service. 

Bolton has pleaded not guilty and asserts his conduct was lawful. He claims the materials in question were personal diaries, unclassified, and known to the FBI. He also claims the case against him is politically motivated, part of a pattern of prosecutorial action lodged against critics of the Trump administration. 

Due to the classified nature of the material, Bolton’s trial is expected to be complex due to rules like the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA).

The strength of the case will hinge on whether prosecutors can prove that the information was properly classified, that Bolton knew it was classified, and that he willfully retained or transmitted the information.

After appearing in court and pleading not guilty Bolton was released on his own recognizance with travel restrictions.

READ MORE:

Comey pleads not guilty

On Oct. 8 James Comey, former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), pleaded not guilty during his arraignment in Alexandria, Virginia. He faces two felony charges: making false statements to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding. 

These charges stem from his testimony during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Sept. 30, 2020, regarding the FBI’s erroneous investigation into links between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.  

A key point of controversy is that Comey’s indictment is unusually brief, providing no specific details about the statements or leaks at issue, leading the defense to argue that the government may not even clearly know what crime they are prosecuting.

The Department of Justice (DOJ), under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has defended the prosecution, stating that the charges against Comey are based on his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2020. The indictment alleges that Comey made a false statement and obstructed a congressional proceeding by denying that he authorized an anonymous FBI source to leak information to the media. 

“No one is above the law,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “Today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people. We will follow the facts in this case.”

Comey’s trial is scheduled to begin on Jan. 5, 2026. His legal team plans to file motions to dismiss the case, citing selective and vindictive prosecution, and questioning the legitimacy of the appointment of the lead prosecutor, Lindsey Halligan, a Trump ally.